The Battle for Brand Integrity: Tata Trusts vs. Unauthorized Use

In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of the Sir Ratan Tata Trust and its affiliates in a case concerning trademark infringement, passing off, and unauthorized use of the name "Ratan Tata." The case, titled Sir Ratan Tata Trust & Anr. vs. Dr. Rajat Shrivastava & Ors., was decided on February 7, 2025, highlighting the importance of protecting well-known trademarks and personal names from unauthorized commercial exploitation.

The plaintiffs, Sir Ratan Tata Trust and its associated entities, initiated legal action against Dr. Rajat Shrivastava and his organization, Delhi Today Group. The defendants were found to be using the registered trademarks "TATA" and "TATA TRUSTS," along with the name and photograph of the late Ratan Tata, to promote and conduct an event titled "The Ratan Tata National Icon Award 2024." Notably, the defendants falsely claimed affiliation with the Tata Trusts, misleading the public into believing the awards carried the endorsement of the esteemed conglomerate.

The Court emphasized that the TATA mark is a globally recognized brand associated with integrity, philanthropy, and corporate excellence. It was further noted that the misuse of the name Ratan Tata falls within the scope of personality rights, which prohibit unauthorized commercial exploitation of an individual's name and likeness. The case drew parallels with previous judgments, including Arun Jaitley v. Network Solutions Private Limited, where the right to protect well-known personal names was upheld.

Additionally, the Court acknowledged that the defendants had actively sought financial gains by charging a nomination fee for the awards, further solidifying the allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation and passing off. The plaintiffs provided substantial evidence, including online posts and public confusion, to establish their claims.

Recognizing the plaintiffs' legitimate concerns, the Court issued a decree in favor of the Tata Trusts, restraining the defendants from using the trademarks TATA, TATA TRUSTS, or the name Ratan Tata in any form. The defendants conceded to the claims, confirming that the award event had been canceled, and the infringing content removed. Additionally, the Court mandated an affidavit of compliance from the defendants to prevent future violations.

This case underscores the significance of trademark and personality rights in India’s corporate landscape. The judgment reinforces that well-known trademarks enjoy extended legal protection against dilution, and individuals of public stature retain exclusive rights over their name and image. Moving forward, this ruling is expected to serve as a precedent for similar cases where organizations attempt to commercially exploit the goodwill of a reputed entity without authorization.

Citation: Sir Ratan Tata Trust & Anr. vs. Dr. Rajat Shrivastava & Ors., Delhi High Court; CS(COMM) 104/2025, decided on 7 February 2025.